Re: KVM vs ESXi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> KVM is meant to be much closer to bare metal performance but doesn't
> have (at the moment) the all inclusive, easily managed from one
> console, turnkey solution to massive virtual installs at the
> datacentre level. If you need to be able to remotely provision VMs and
> move them whilst live from one centre to another whilst upscaling them
> then you will probably need to go with vmware.  If you have got the

 Mike,

 Are you familiar with any of the tools listed here

  http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Management_Tools

 e.g. Proxmox, ConVirt, OpenNebula, Ganeti, openQRM? Comments?


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux