Re: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 05/18/2011 08:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> It was discussed, but that doesn't change anyone's mindset about open vs. closed 
> processes or whether being more open and permitting community insight and 
> participation would ultimately keep the project from going the way of Whitebox. 

Hello Les,

CentOS is used on more web servers than Red Hat Enterprise Linux and
Fedora combined ... it is not going anywhere.

Also, the slight decrease that was happening in Linux in general (which
was mirrored by CentOS) in October of 2010 is also corrected.


http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-centos/all/all

Facebook uses thousands of CentOS servers.  They are quite happy with
it.  Amazon EC2 has thousands of CentOS servers.  They are also quite
happy with it. We just became a fully supported OS on Microsoft Hyper-V.

Can we do a better job at some things, sure.  But trust me, CentOS is
going nowhere.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux