> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 50 -j ACCEPT > -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 51 -j ACCEPT That's _protocol_ 50 and 51; not ports 50 and 51 % grep '5[01]' /etc/protocols esp 50 ESP # Encap Security Payload ah 51 AH # Authentication Header IPSec traffic. -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Why is iptables configured to accept packets on ports 50 and 51?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Why is iptables configured to accept packets on ports 50 and 51?
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:20:17 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTikd098i=cXsFsk8v9DDbSbdLzS+7w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- References:
- Why is iptables configured to accept packets on ports 50 and 51?
- From: Aleksey Tsalolikhin
- Why is iptables configured to accept packets on ports 50 and 51?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is iptables configured to accept packets on ports 50 and 51?
- Next by Date: Re: So sorry! was: Re: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is iptables configured to accept packets on ports 50 and 51?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is iptables configured to accept packets on ports 50 and 51?
- Index(es):
 |