Re: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

[John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/16/11 1:18 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Yes, but whatever can't be automated here should benefit from doing the
> trial-and-error in parallel.   And the potential improvements might come
> in the automation process as much as the grunge work - you can't really
> predict how an open project will develop.

so you are volunteering to take over 4.next or 5.x or whatever when the 
time comes ?  you can come up with the build infrastructure and develop 
this automation in the meantime?  I'd suggest starting with recreating 
5.6 by working from 5.5 and the RHEL 5,6 SRPMs exclusively.  let us know 
how long it takes from scratch, ok?   you don't mind that 
we-the-community would want our packagers vetted by demonstrating the 
ability to deliver...  consider this a test run.


-- 
john r pierce                            N 37, W 123
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos