On Saturday, May 14, 2011 01:28 AM, aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>> On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
>>>
>>> We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while
>>> its
>>> basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship,
>>> ApacheDS
>>> claims more robust replication, etc...
>>>
>>> Granted I am working with the version bundled with CentOS, I do
>>> understand that the latest OpenLDAP is wayyyyyyy betterrrr :)
>>
>> Since you are shopping, I wonder if you have looked at opends?
>
> No, but after reading your post I checked it.
>
> Looks cool, Java based which seems the in thing, I like it.
>
> But, and not to sound lamerz; the Sun sponsor turned me off.
>
> At this stage in my career and life. I look at these feeble attempts
> by large virus like organizations to say "hey look world, we encourage
> free and open... " like Microsoft making a big deal about donating
> $100K to the Apache Foundation.
>
/me shrugs
opends branched away from Sun DS a long time ago and I doubt very much
that it is still 'Sun sponsored'. More like the developers have not
bother to update the site.
I use it for my winbind backend and its management was way more easier
than trying to figure out openldap. Of course, I will probably be using
Samba's DS with samba4 in future.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
