Re: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 5/12/11, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Apparently they did admit and it does change:
>> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=31347&forum=53
>
> Late breaking news:
> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/67
> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/69

This is really nice and it's good to see that the devs did take all
those feedback into consideration and did something to make the
process more visible.

As for SL vs CentOS choices, I'd agree both teams did the right thing
if only because of how I'm using them. I get to update my existing
C5.5s yet at the same time I could use SL6 to begin testing for
upcoming deployment as well as troubleshoot potential issues I had
with running KVM.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux