On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: > > > > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > > > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 > would > > take no more than 1 month ? > > Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake. > > > > > Why? seems like a valid point to me. 1. Have you, or anyone else, noticed the speed of the CentOS-5 and CentOS-4 updates recently? We have spread out the building and checking up updates .. there has been a marked improvement is release speed for updates. 2. Have you, or anyone else, noticed that we have started pushing out the upstream EL Fastrack channel for CentOS-5. In CentOS it is named fasttrack (spelling) on our end due to upstream IP restrictions. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/fasttrack/ 3. Have you, or anyone else, noticed the QA tracking site that is open to the public? http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/ There is a dashboard of recent events: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/dashboard There is even an RSS feed: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/feed Most of the names who are posting there and taking action are NOT CentOS Project guys, but community people ... isn't that what people were asking for? 4. Have you, or anyone else, noticed the aggregated list of status announcements that we now have? The forum moderators are great and they have started an announcement forum area where they aggregate important information: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewforum.php?forum=53 ================================================== It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty comments about how nothing changes. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
