On 05/08/11 1:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > If you can use less drives, this would be more cost effective (time building& > time fixing) > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811219038 [400$] multiple reports online indicate that norco case is very flimsy and poorly made. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 13:11:57 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <832D4127E6324F8F81D2192815C6C94F@phoenix>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- References:
- Building a Back Blaze style POD
- From: Jason
- Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- From: Rudi Ahlers
- Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- From: Jason
- Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- From: Jason Pyeron
- Building a Back Blaze style POD
- Prev by Date: Re: Am I being to paranoid?
- Next by Date: Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- Previous by thread: Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- Next by thread: Re: Building a Back Blaze style POD
- Index(es):
 |