On May 3, 2011, at 4:52 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2011, Mattias Geniar wrote: > >> Understandable, but since a lot of people are still going to stick >> with >> CentOS 4/5 for legacy reasons, I would argue that nss_ldap is still >> worth "fixing". > > I'm not saying it's not worth fixing, I suspect it's fundamentally > unfixable > without a complete redesign. > >> It's not as fancy as sssd of course, but it's what people are using >> right now. :-) > > sssd answers a lot of these questions. It's definitely not a perfect > replacement yet, but it's going in the right direction if you ask me. So whats the answer today for ~10K users? The bug fixes suggested here work around the problems I have been encountering. Can any one comment on what ppl are using for larger deployments? I hope its not a resounding M$ AD?! - aurf _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos