centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> Enough is enough.
>>>>
>>>> Can we _please_ consolidate such status updates, the few times they
>>>> appear, at _one_ location? People should not have to play guessing
>>>> games as to where status updates may or may not appear, nor should
>>>> they have to be checking a minimum of 3 sources to locate such
>>>> information.
>>>>
>>>> Having a single location would be a great boon and would allow us
>>>> to point people to one "official" location when the inevitable
>>>> questions on releases come up.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> +1
>> And it's not asking too much that the CentOS team post *here* the
>> information for which they KNOW we're waiting with bated breath;
>> meaning *here on this list as well as on their many other
>> locations*, including forums I don't have access to on a regular
>> basis.
>
> And the people who do not have access to their e-mail want the twitter
> updated so they can read it on their cell phones.
>
> And the people who like forums want that updated.
>
> etc, etc.
>
> Look, we have "NO IDEA" when everything is going to be done
> on CentOS 6.
Not the issue at all here.
> We will release CentOS 6 to QA as soon as we get it finished.
This is all that's expected.
...along with the update being posted in the expected places...
Insert spiffy .sig here:
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
//me
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
