On 4/30/11 1:09 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >> But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically >> "centosy", and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing the >> artwork.... Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here. > > Are we? I don't see this and I don't understand your remark. Has it really been so long since the upstream release that you've forgotten that we might someday see a corresponding CentOS version and have to start figuring out how to use it? > I suppose you didn't understand *my* request. I ask that people behave so that > this list remains a valuable source for peer-to-peer support. I do understand it, but since you wanted specifically Centos issues, it's hard to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos, since that and a few quirks of yum are really the only things specific to Centos. And it's not like an extra message or two is going to displace any technical information. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos