2011/4/29 John Hinton <webmaster@xxxxxxxx>
On 4/29/2011 1:46 PM, Digimer wrote:I could easily be confused as it has been so long now... I think
> On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
>> I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given
>> the above paragraph.
> Probably a programmatic requirement, if I was the betting type.
>
Whitebox actually changed that to whitebox-release and maybe CentOS did
the save very early on. But, many applications look for that file and if
they see redhat-release, know their stuff can run on your system and you
are off to the races. I suppose the final answer was it wasn't an
infringement and solved a lot of other problems. Seems I had to edit
this file or name to get something to run on a server like 4 or 5 years
ago?
Am I required to remember everything I did from that long back? LOL
There might be some stuff in the archives though... back in the early
ver. 3 days.
--
John Hinton
877-777-1407 ext 502
http://www.ew3d.com
Comprehensive Online Solutions
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos