John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
>> yes indeed
>> i look through the sources and the path is hardcoded
>> it s really strange some packages for centos are built but obviously
>> don't work.
>
> I am by no means an expert on connection tracking, but poking through
> the sources from alt.ru I don't get the impression that the package as
> supplied works at all. It's possible I am doing things incorrectly,
> however.
>
> I am seeing segfaults with conntrackd and my earlier thought that it was
> just a /proc path issue may not be fully correct as it's looking for
> "nf_conntrack_count" and not "ip_conntrack_count" which is what is
> present on the boxes I've looked at.
>
> Just for reference: I rebuilt libnetfilter_conntrack, along with
> conntrack_tools, both from alt.ru, so there was no version mismatch.
>
> If you ever get this working drop me a line; I'd be curious to know
> whether the package is indeed not working or I'm just doing something
> brain-dead.
>
>
Has anybody tried to use RPMForge package?
Ljubomir
>
>
> John
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
