From: "Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane" <todd.denniston@xxxxxxxx>
> Not being a PHP developer, I was under the impression that many/most of these
>packages were interpreted scripts which probably would work fine under php53
>vs. the php installed by default.
> I have been wondering from afar about this thread and the discussions over in
>the EPEL list, if someone could create a meta rpm that required php53 and
>provided php (and similar for php-mysql & php-snmp) and have the system
>continue to work. This is of course under the assumptions of:
> a. the packages are interpreted scripts
> b. the syntax has only added, and not changed or removed functionality since
>the stock php.
>
> Is this a not_bright idea in the php package world?
Almost... some languages' instructions almost never change, others do a bit
more...
By example, see: http://www.php.net/manual/en/migration53.incompatible.php
JD
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
