On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
> Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>>> Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
>>> *.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
>>> perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place -
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you are right. Amongst the various tests, there is one that checks
>> for dupe packages, and we have 2 anaconda srpms this time, the i386 and
>> x86_64 are built from identical srpm's; but I had to bump version on one
>> arch, without needing to do that on the other. So there are 2
>> anaconda-srpm in the SRPMS/ repo, causing the test to fail and that
>> entire lot not going through. I like the test, and would like to keep it
>> in place, so will do a force-pass for now and that should see the
>> packages go through at some point today.
>>
>
> I'll look out them.
>
> Thanks KB, you're legend!
>
Hi guys,
I'm still not seeing some SRPMs (eg httpd-2.2.3-45.el5)
Any news about it Karanbir?
Regards,
--
Filipe
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
