Re: Centos 6 Update?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




> It sounds to me like  "your big beef" is that you can't run the CentOS
> distribution the way *you*  want it run. Whether you agree or not,
> doesn't change the fact that CentOS  *is* enterprise ready.-- and many
> enterprises use it. The only time there are  significant delays in

No, I would just like the name and website to match the facts. I would suggest 
that anybody that calls centOS "enterprise-ready" might have a different concept 
to what an enterprise is to me. Enterprise to me is at least a 1000 users and 
dozens of live servers. If CentOS is only suitable for test environment then I 
don't really class that as enterprise-ready, either.

> 
> As for rebuilding, why would you want to rebuild  CentOS? Why not do
> what CentOS does and get the sources directly from Red Hat  and rebuild
> that? Obviously you must think there is still some value in the  CentOS
> name.
> 

I was just trying to illustrate a point, rather than actually wanting to do it.



> -- 
> RonB -- Using CentOS  5.6
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing  list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux