On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:25:06PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/ I've read the articles; I've no need to re-read them. > (For the record, I couldn't find any previous disparaging comments from him... I > stopped at page 6) You didn't look very hard. > Maybe he is a hack, I have no clue. But he is a hack with a fairly big > linux-focused audience that repeated a few home truths (in my opinion). I am > using it to try to illustrate how the status quo is harming the project. If that > isn't important to you or you don't agree, that's fine. The project is fine for what I need it for. And, again, it's only a tiny fraction of the user base that has a problem with the project and the project management that are making a big stink about things. > And those that think everything is peachy are also a tiny minority as far as we > know, because I reckon 95%+ of CentOS users never post on the list. I wish > people would stop stating what the *think* as *fact*. I've never said that there weren't issues. Matter of fact I've agreed that there are indeed communication problems that I hope will be resolved. The difference is I'm not crying about the sky falling. And do us a favor? Take your own advice. John -- Given sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -- Woody Page, Denver sports columnist
Attachment:
pgp6jRf5oEZfT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
