Re: Cant find out MCE reason (CPU 35 BANK 8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 03/22/11 19:00, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Vladimir Budnev wrote:
>    
>> 2011/3/22<m.roth@xxxxxxxxx>
>>      
> <CHOMP>
>    
>>>>> So with 2 4-core Xeons, I don't understand how you can get 3x and 5x.
>>>>> Could you post some raw messages, either from /var/log/message or
>>>>> from /var/log/mcelog?
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> sure here they are before "night party":
>>>> MCE 24
>>>> CPU 52 BANK 8 TSC 372a290717a
>>>> MISC 68651f800001186 ADDR 7dd2ad840
>>>> STATUS cc0002800001009f MCGSTATUS 0
>>>> MCE 25
>>>>          
>>> <snip>
>>> At this point, I throw up my hands. I have *no* idea how they could get
>>> numbers like CPU 52, unless something's wrong in the o/s - I mean, you
>>> are running 64 bit, right?
>>>        
>> Yeah, x86_64
>> I have an idea dunno....the thing is we r runngin 4.8 centos. Its old
>> enough and mcelog version is old enough also, mb it decodes something
>>      
> completely
>    
>> wrong.
>>      
> It could be that 4.8 doesn't really understand the CPU.
>
>    
>> Anyway thanks so much for your time and answers. Hope we will find those
>> dimms in experiments.
>>      
> Seriously - how old is this? I think you should call your vendor: some
> will give you phone or email support, even after the end of warranty.
>
>           mark
>
>    

Forgot to write our solution, mb it will be usefull for someone. In our 
case the problem was(as expected) in DIMM modules. After replacing no 
more scare mcelogs e.t.c.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux