Re: cross-platform email client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Kenneth Porter <shiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> --On Friday, April 15, 2011 8:56 PM -0600 Devin Reade <gdr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Check out Mulberry.  <http://mulberrymail.com/>
> 
> The main drawback to Mulberry is that it doesn't display images, and its 
> HTML rendering is primitive. But if you're like me and deal primarily in 
> text, and want to only open images and attachments explicitly (good way to 
> avoid infections), Mulberry works great.

I would actually consider the image aspect an advantage rather than
disadvantage, but YMMV.  Most images in email seem to related to signatures, 
auto-appended organization, or spam-related (what little slips through
my filters).  If it's actually an image of interest, I can right-click
and select to view or extract it, the former of which uses the OS's
default image viewer (eog for CentOS, iirc).

It also avoids the issue of web-bugs put into html email.

Yes, the html rendering is primitive, but I don't usually notice as
I have mulberry configured to show the text part of multipart mail,
which works just fine in most cases.  A few html-only newsletters I
get are the only things that are so rendered, and they always have
links to online versions.

> It's particulary wonderful if you have a huge hierarchy of folders.

Agreed, along with the rest of the observations.

Devin
-- 
The greatest productive force is human selfishness.
							- Robert Heinlein

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux