Re: 40TB File System Recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/15/2011 06:05 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
> Woohoo, next we will be seeing md raid6 also giving comparable results
> if that is the case. I am not the only person on this list that thinks
> cache is king for raid5/6 on hardware raid boards and the using hardware
> raid + bbu cache for better performance one of the two reasons why we
> don't do md raid5/6.
>
>

That *is* md RAID6. Sorry I didn't make that clear. I don't use anyone's 
hardware RAID6 right now because I haven't found a board so far that was 
as fast as using md. I get better performance from even a BBU backed 95X 
series 3ware board by using it to serve the drives as JBOD and then 
using md to do the actual raid.

> Yeah, you are right - but cache is primarily to buffer the writes for
> performance. Why else go through the expense of getting bbu cache? So
> what happens when you tweak bonnie a bit?

For smaller writes. When writes *do* fit in the cache you get a big 
bump. As I said: Helps some cases, not all cases. BBU backed cache helps 
if you have lots of small writes. Not so much if you are writing 
gigabytes of stuff more sequentially.

-- 
Benjamin Franz
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux