Re: [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...

[Calvin Webster <cwebster@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 02:09 +0100, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster <cwebster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
> > way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
> > the question. RHEL 4 updates must be painstakingly retrieved manually,
> > one at a time, on the "Internet machine" before transport and
> > distribution to internal networks
> 
> Why not purchase RHN Proxy instead?
> 
Prohibitively expensive for our budget. We'd have to purchase 2 (one
external/internet and 1 internal/intranet) and I'd still have to
sneakernet the data and sync.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos