Re: Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Ian Murray wrote:

>
>
>> This is really disrespectful to talk about on  here. The devs spent  
>> a ton of
>> their spare time to develop centos, last thing  you should talk  
>> about is
>> starting competing projects...
>>
>> Peter.
>
> I really don't get this list. The threads I have read on the Xen  
> list suggest
> there is no problem with a discussion about the relative merits of  
> KVM so why is
> everything so personal on this list? Something quite unhealthy is  
> going on here,
> IMHO.

Its not that at all (to me).

Then again the Xen lists don't have ppl whining about a missed rel  
date with personal attaches about leadership.

The guys maintaining Centos have ownership of the project which  
results in a sense of pride and personal feelings about it.

Plus, I think it was the timing of the post regarding DAGs RHEL like  
project.

There is an order of magnitude more traffic on this list then on the  
Xen list.

- aurf
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux