On Tuesday 12 April 2011 17:36:39 John Jasen wrote: > On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan > > <alain.pean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > <mailto:alain.pean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > <snipped: two recommendations for XFS> > > I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous > employer, two cases involving XFS resulted in irrecoverable data > corruption. These were on RAID systems running from 4 to 20 TB. Can someone(who actually knows) share with us, what is the state of xfs-utils, how stable and usable are they for recovery of broken XFS filesystems? Marian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
