Re: 40TB File System Recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12.4.2011 15:02, Marian Marinov wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:56:54 rainer-RNrd0m5o0MABOiyIzIsiOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Yes... but with such RAID10 solution you get only half of the disk space... so 
> from 10 2TB drives you get only 10TB instead of 16TB with RAID6.

From a somewhat theoretical view, this is true for standard raid10 but
Linux md raid10 is much more flexible as I understood it. You could do 2
copys over 2 disks, thats like standard 10. Or you could do 2 copys over
2 or 3 or ... x disks. Or you could do 3 copys over 3 or 4 or ... x
disks. Do the math. See the manpage for md(4) and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels#Linux_MD_RAID_10

However, I have to admit that I have no experience with that but would
like to hear about any disadvantages or if I am mislead. I am just
interested.

-- 
Kind Regards, Markus Falb

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux