On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Keith Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:08:29AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>>
>>> Except for the whole "I resign" issue with Dag and the project.
>>>
>>> He's stirring up trouble for the sake of stirring up trouble.
>>
>> Yes, and CentOS does not have issues ! It's all Dag that's making it up.
>
> These are not mutually exclusive. It is possible for CentOS to have
> problems and for you to stir up trouble at the same time. Whether you
> mean it to or not, your posts come off as bitter sniping, and not as
> constructive criticisms of CentOS.
You can read into my statements what you like, but do also read the facts
I bring up and the deafening silence from the project about some real
issues. None of these are new by the way.
BTW tell me how one can be constructive if:
- the project does not plan to discuss why it took 84 days for CentOS
5.6 and 5 months for CentOS 6.0
- the project has QA closed to a limited group of people and the
development process closed
- the project is not interested to allow more people to collaborate
- no other team members actually dare to speak up other than the three
people that have sign-access
This is not a community project. A community shares information for the
benefit of everyone.
--
-- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info@xxxxxxxxx, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
