>> I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
>> have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
>> have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
>>
>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/
>>
>> Can anyone please confirm/deny that?
>
> Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes
> (http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list
> of packages modified by centos - and that includes httpd. So the
> absence of 'centos' in the release string does _not_ mean that the
> package is unmodified (ie it's merely re-built).
>
> Sigh!!! Just have to wait for the centos SRPMS then
for me i do remove the repo's during kickstart however during an
upgrade they'll come back unless they are removed from the package.
I have just rebuilt the 5.5 release package to not have them and made
the changes to make it appear as the 5.6 release package so for me all
good.
thanks
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
