On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to reportOn Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark <sclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an adjustment.Akemi I just finished building a kernel based on kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.src.rpm. I hand applied the patches. Like you said one applied clean the other applied with a fuzz offset of -36 (IIRC). I am installing now to test. My rebuild was simply cp the /boot/config-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.i686 to .config;make oldconfig;make rpm That is why I was asking about the proper way. I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing.Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. that they appear to work as advertised. With: net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 2 net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 2 Router solicitations were issued and router advertisements were accepted and I could still forward packets. I didn't make new patches, I simply did %define with_fuzzy_patches 1 Also what should the normal rpmbuild line be? I ended up doing rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` kernel.spec --with firmware --without debug --without debuginfo The first time I didn't have --with firmware and the kernel wouldn't install. Regards, --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
