Re: Centos 6 Update?

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/7/2011 3:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> CentOS AIMS to be 100% binary compatible and for the most part it is,
> but I'm tired of seeing this misnomer repeated over and over like some
> holy grail. Personally I'm with Russ on this one that whilst an
> admirable goal I think the importance of binary compatibility is
> sometimes overstated and often misunderstood.

Plus, if there is anything that is broken about what you get by 
rebuilding RHEL src rpms under RHEL, it should be made public and either 
fixed or acknowleged as the intended outcome.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos