on 4/7/2011 1:02 PM Dag Wieers spake the following:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Tom H wrote:
>>
>>> This is the kind of answer that CentOS as a project
>>> shouldn't allow (KB's recent use-something-else email is
>>> another example) because it makes the developers look like
>>> rank amateurs.
>>
>> It is _so_ easy to tell others what they should or should not
>> do. Easier still for a bystander to criticize to jeer and
>> mock from the sidelines
>
> When people state the project can do better, who did translate "the
> project" to "Johnny" or "Karanbir" ? Nobody did, except Johnny and
> Karanbir.
>
> Nobody is asking Johnny or Karanbir to work harder, that's the fallacy.
>
> But only Johnny and Karanbir can change how this project is organized at
> the moment and the project is currently organized in such a way that if we
> want more timely releases and updates, or we want better communication, or
> we want more transparancy, Johnny and Karanbir will have to work harder.
>
> It doesn't have to be like this, but it feels like certain forces want to
> keep things framed like this in discussions.
>
Are they resistant to change, or maybe just really don't know where to start?
It looks like the latter may apply a little better.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
