On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Changing the subject line for good ...
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>> AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting
>> 6.0 RH releases patched source. This makes backing out a patch, or
>> backporting patches from future development in Fedora (e.g.) far more
>> nightmarish than before.
>
> This one doesn't impact the CentOS core rebuild. It would/could impact CentOSPlus.
Yes, it _could_ affect the centosplus kernel. This point was addressed
early on when RHEL-6 was released back in Nov 2010. See:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586
Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any
feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I outlined there.
While you are there, look also at the issues described for Point 3
(note 12052). Anyone can help in there as well. :)
So far, "luckily" centosplus kernels are "ahead of" the distro kernel
in that they have been built and are available for testing (see note
12502).
Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
