On 7.4.2011 16:58, Les Mikesell wrote: > While SL and other distributions are perfectly fine for almost all uses, > there's a certain irony in the fact the single advantage of CentOS is > the ease of converting from it to a paid/supported RHEL installation, > and the RH changes that make the rebuild difficult are driving people away. This sounds as if RH is responsible for not yet released CentOS 6 ? What did I miss ? What changes do you talking about ? -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos