Re: 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster (was:Re: ZFS @ centOS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

You really, really, really don't want to do this.  Not on 32-bit.  When you roll one byte over 16TB you will lose access to your filesystem, silently, and it will not remount on a 32-bit kernel.  XFS works best on a 64-bit kernel for a number of reasons; the one you're likely to hit first is the 16TB hard limit for *occupied* file space; you can mkfs an XFS filesystem on a 17TB or even larger partition or volume, but the moment the occupied data rolls over the 16TB boundary you will be in disaster recovery mode, and a 64-bit kernel will be required for rescue.

The reason I know this?  I had it happen.  On a CentOS 32-bit backup server with a 17TB LVM logical volume on EMC storage.  Worked great, until it rolled 16TB.  Then it quit working.  Altogether.  /var/log/messages told me that the filesystem was too large to be mounted.  Had to re-image the VM as a 64-bit CentOS, and then re-attached the RDM's to the LUNs holding the PV's for the LV, and it mounted instantly, and we kept on trucking.

There's a reason upstream doesn't do XFS on 32-bit.

Afaik 32-bit binaries do run on the 64-bit build and compat libraries exist for most everything. You should evaluate if you really *really* need 32-bit. 


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux