On Apr 4, 2011, at 3:11 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
> "SL didn't pass the muster in our env in terms of a drop in
> replacement
> for Centos.
>
> On the other hand, we have simply dropped in Centos in place of RHEL
> w/
> o issue.
>
> Our env is a rather complex CGI/VFX based pipeline that is not trivial
> to design or support.
>
> So if you have 12-24 months, I'd wait, seriously man, what's the
> rush?"
>
>
> I have to provide a reliable and scalable infrastructure, and that
> requires a reliable provider / updates. While I do not need Centos 6
> today, this development cycle has certainly raised questions as to
> whether the development process can be relied upon. The whole "when
> it's ready" mantra works well for academic/individual users, but you
> can't plan business processes based on it.
Get over yourself.
Buy RHEL then Mr. "provide a reliable and scalable infrastructure".
- aurf
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
