>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf >Of ken >Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: about:plugins <-Re: interview request for ppl who have >Shockwave/.Firefox working > >Under "Tools..." I have "Adobe Reader 9.3", "Adobe Reader 9.4" >(temporarily disabled due to testing), "Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2 >Plug-in Compatible", "NPAPI Plugins Wrapper 1.3.0", and "Shockwave Flash >10 0 r153", that's all. > >Now looking at about:plugins under "Shockwave Flash" it says: > > File: nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so > Version: > Shockwave Flash 10.2 r153 > >So to your question, the evidence seems to be saying that, yes, >Shockwave is the same as Flash, at least on Linux. Or do you see >something different? Well, kinda' different over here, at least on Firefox4 running on WinXP. Shockwave Flash File: NPSWF32.dll Shockwave Flash 10.2 r152 Shockwave for Director File: np32dsw.dll Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version 11.5.8.612 Some differences are expected I guess, platform-wise. Just wasn't sure if Shockwave and Flash were the same thing. Will be quiet now. 8-) -- /Sorin
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
