people working on it, yet they don't actually aim for 100% binary compatibility, just "good enough".
I have used CentOS for a while and wasn't really aware of SL until recently. With all the projects that
get supported by companies it just seems like CentOS would be a natural choice for a large
technology company.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Rainer Duffner <rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 26.03.2011 um 22:16 schrieb Gary Scarborough:
Every couple of months.
> There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer
> list and this list about CentOS. My initial thought was why not
> have CentOS and SL merge. Since they have different goals I can
> understand the reason not to. So my next question is, has no
> corporate entity offered to sponsor full time people to work on
> CentOS? It seems like a lot of companies use CentOS for various
> things. I can't believe no one is willing to help speed development
> by paying for people to build full time. Has this subject come up
> before?
People who have enough money to make significant contributions to this
goal usually hire a couple of competent admins and do it in-house.
For the rest, there is RHEL - or OEL.
Do you think one can undercut RHAT or ORCL?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
