Re: The delays on CentOS 5.6are causing EPEL incompatibilities

["Brunner, Brian T." <BBrunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> 
>> You missed my point to the poster.  While Centos is my defacto
>> production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing
>> like RHEL. 
>> 
>> So I thought instead of going with such a diff paradigm, that using
>> SL might be more similar in tool set then Ubuntu.
>> 
> 
> But if the underlying issue is that Red Hat is intentionally making
> the rebuilds difficult, any derivative is going to be fragile.

RH fired at Novell and Oracle, but CentOS and SL are hit by the muzzle
blast.
I wonder if RH is aware that we're pretty consistent advertizing for RH.

Is there another UV we can call TUV?  I don't suppose RH would care if
we (CentOS & SL) both disappeared.

Insert spiffy .sig here:
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.

//me
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos