Re: The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/22/11 8:23 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:18:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the SL notes
>> on the srpms that don't build with the listed dependencies as shipped
>> - and they aren't being picky about the library linkages matching the
>> RH binaries like CentOS is.  If the RH build links things from source
>> they don't ship, how much can you trust the projects that depend on
>> that source to be able to ship timely updates?
>
> 	If you don't trust the project _why_ are you here?
>

The CentOS team has a good history and tested binary compatibility has its 
advantages - but they do rely on the upstream which previously was not openly 
hostile to rebuilds.  It's not necessarily even possible to get binary 
compatibility if matching source isn't made available.

-- 
    Les Mikesell
      lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos