Joe Polk wrote:
>>I was under the impression that you only needed SpamCopURI if you
>>were using the 2.x versions of SpamAssassin? Starting with 3.0 they
>>include that plugin by default, no?
>>
>>I used SpamCopURI but upgraded to SpamAssassin 3 when it came out.
>> It works great.
>
> But Centos Repositories don't include 3.0 and I don't want to manually upgrade.
IMO, stuff like SpamAssassin and Clam Antivirus can't be kept in a 5
year release-cycle. I've found some major show-stopper bugs with
SpamAssassin 2.x that were corrected in 3.x. So while I use CentOS to
keep 99% of the packages in a stable release cycle, I update a few
packages manually. And it's super easy to build an RPM for SpamAssassin:
Grab the latest tarball, install the rpm-devel package and then:
rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz
--Ajay
