centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Michael Eager
> <eager@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>>
>>> If the issue is repeated but rare system failures on one of a set of
>>> similarly configured hosts, I'd RMA the box and get a replacement.
>>> End of story.
>>
>> I'll repeat: this is a house-made system. There's no vendor to RMA
>> to.
>
> I don't know where you are,
His signature list CA/USA.
> but in our country we can RMA anything and
> everything. Apart from CPU's. So, even a cheap desktop mobo could be
> RMA'd, as long as I can prove to the suppliers it's faulty, and it's
> within the warrenty period
Here in the USA we can RMA stuff if we can show it is dysfunctional.
Michael's position is that he has no evidence of a dysfunctional part, which could be RMA'd.
He has evidence of a dysfunctional gestalt, comprising hardware, software, environment, and data stream.
Insert spiffy .sig here:
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
//me
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
