> no,my mean is the keepalived lvs need ipvsadm Ah right. Sorry, I thought you were having more problems :) Steve _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: keepalived+LVS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: keepalived+LVS
- From: "Steve Barnes" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:12:15 +1100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=oRbxTd9atZ8RNX_szH9cW6Mq8Drr9bANaF-Kh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: keepalived+LVS
- From: bedo
- Re: keepalived+LVS
- References:
- keepalived+LVS
- From: bedo
- Re: keepalived+LVS
- From: Steve Barnes
- Re: keepalived+LVS
- From: bedo
- Re: keepalived+LVS
- From: Steve Barnes
- Re: keepalived+LVS
- From: bedo
- keepalived+LVS
- Prev by Date: Re: keepalived+LVS
- Next by Date: Re: BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)
- Previous by thread: Re: keepalived+LVS
- Next by thread: Re: keepalived+LVS
- Index(es):
 |