James Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd <slackmoehrle.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Brian,
>> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your
>> reply.
>>>
>>> OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
<snip>
> if they think the solution requires a lot of CPU. Memory wise I think
> machines come with at least 4Gb these days. That should do. You can
> probably both boxes for around 2k?
>
> You already know how much F5 or any of those guys cost per device. =)
Hmmm... when the job I was at went with Radware, their price was
significantly lower than F5, and I was impressed with the appliance. Nice
little 1u box, not even a pizza box deep, as I recall.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
