>What part of KVM seems immature to you? I deploy public-facing >machines using both it and Xen, and I can't really speak to any >difference in performance or small-scall management. I like kvm - no issues _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Xen stack scheme
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Xen stack scheme
- From: "compdoc" <compdoc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:16:27 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1103040906090.20998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AQFQSobtI7QjMugX4UWdv4koB7zGIgFzFkRslQjx5TA=
- References:
- Xen stack scheme
- From: Jussi Hirvi
- Re: Xen stack scheme
- From: Paul Heinlein
- Xen stack scheme
- Prev by Date: Re: Xen stack scheme
- Next by Date: Re: Centos 6
- Previous by thread: Re: Xen stack scheme
- Next by thread: Migrating standalone systems to xen guests
- Index(es):
 |