Re: Scientific Linux 6.0 released (based on RHEL 6.0)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:35 AM, carlopmart <carlopmart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>> And?? Why do you want to start a new flame??

That was certainly not the intent.  Pls. see below.

> Now, now, be nice. It's nice to know if another open source knowledge
> has achieved a goal. It also provides an early testing platform for
> people who want to run some behavior comparisons. For example, the
> format of the "kickstart" file has changed in RHEL 6, and yum no
> longer installs both i386 and x86_64 components by default. It's a lot
> easier to get a handle on such changes if you can test them out early,
> even if CentOS 6 isn't available yet.

Posted here for the motivations cited above and for those interested
in getting an early start.

I don't have access to a RHEL subscription.  I use CentOS.  I am going
to use SL 6 to learn what is going to be new in CentOS 6.

-- Arun Khan
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux