On 4.3.2011 10.52, Simon Matter wrote: > I don't know if it's recommended that way but at least it works fine. Hm, that is kind of the only important thing. :-) If it is not recommended, there have to be better reasons for that than mere tidiness. - Jussi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Xen stack scheme
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Xen stack scheme
- From: Jussi Hirvi <listmember@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:11:52 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <95d6de11ae9a8c9f9a7238b293ec93f6.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Thunderbird/3.1.8
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Xen stack scheme
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: Xen stack scheme
- References:
- Xen stack scheme
- From: Jussi Hirvi
- Re: Xen stack scheme
- From: Simon Matter
- Xen stack scheme
- Prev by Date: kernel vulnerabilities
- Next by Date: kernel NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
- Previous by thread: Re: Xen stack scheme
- Next by thread: Re: Xen stack scheme
- Index(es):
 |