on 16:30 Thu 03 Mar, Les Mikesell (lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On 3/3/2011 4:19 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > on 16:07 Thu 03 Mar, Les Mikesell (lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >> On 3/3/2011 3:34 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> >>> on 13:36 Thu 03 Mar, Sean Carolan (scarolan@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >>>> I really like gnu screen and use it everyday but there's one thing
> >>>> that is a bit inconvenient, and that's the odd line wrapping and
> >>>> terminal size issues that seem to pop up. The problem crops up when I
> >>> Is your local terminal type known to all remote systems (in termcap)?
> >> Instead of running screen, can you run a desktop session under
> >> freenx on a server
> > No xlibs on our servers.
>
> You need _a_ machine somewhere that can host a freenx session. It
> doesn't need to be the target of the ssh connections, just something
> that will mostly stay powered up if you want the session to stay active
> all the time. A development box or even a VM session that would work -
> or a desktop machine if it stays on all the time. It doesn't even have
> to run X on its own console.
Frankly, given the alternative ease of automatically redefining $TERM,
that strikes me as a slightly overengineered solution.
Not that I'm intrinsically opposed to overengineering.
--
Dr. Ed Morbius, Chief Scientist / |
Robot Wrangler / Staff Psychologist | When you seek unlimited power
Krell Power Systems Unlimited | Go to Krell!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
