Re: virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:

> On Thursday, March 03, 2011 04:04:42 pm Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> Although it's not there yet, I'm sure we'll get there sooner than  
>> expected
>
> To be fair to VMware Fusion on OS X, the graphics acceleration is  
> fantastic, running Windows 7 in full Aero mode with no problems.   
> But it still can't keep accurate time.

In general yes its fine, but for specific targeted needs,  
virtualization may not be a viable option which I think was the point.

I think pass through is very very cool which VMware Player/Fusion  
doesn't do regarding graphics.

Having multiple cards/resources in a host and doling em out/dedicating  
them to any VM would be very cool.

Hence PVOPS 2.6.32 and Xen 4.0.1.

Although KVM is also supposed to do this.

- aurf

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux