> Oh , The ISO size is about 4.7G . But that can work well before .... > Before what? Was there a change? A quick google leads to (at least one point in time) needing -o lfs in the mount command to the samba instance since large file support wasn't there by default... Unfortunately I don't have and C4 boxes to test with. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- From: James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:46:23 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTimkg6gNf4Ji01u0hcEw=r5M4QkoLOBm=1aP_Kus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- From: sync
- Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- References:
- CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- From: sync
- Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- From: James Hogarth
- Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- From: sync
- CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- Prev by Date: Re: virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
- Next by Date: Re: virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
- Previous by thread: Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS 4.6 Samba Mount problem
- Index(es):
 |