On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:20 -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:24 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> >
> >> http://21DA:00D3::00FF:FE28:8080
> >>
> >> is that...
> >> http://[21DA:00D3:0000:0000:0000:00FF:FE28:8080]
> >> or
> >> http://[21DA:00D3:0000:0000:0000:0000:00FF:FE28]:8080
> >>
>
> >
> > What separator would you have chosen?
> >
> >
> > What would anyone have chosen ?
> 4 hex digits vs. 1-3 decimal digits provides adequate disambiguation.
1:2:3:4 or 1.2.3.4 ? Each segment of the former is a valid 'decimal'
number and also a valid 'hexadecimal' number. Each segment of the later
is a valid decimal number.
Still does not answer the question I posed of what separator would
anyone have used for IP6 addresses.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
