Re: IP6 Anyone?

[John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/26/11 12:33 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> With IPV6, you don't need to run it on a different port.
> Just bind it to a different IP in the same prefix ;-)
> So, that port-8080 stuff will be gone pretty soon.
> In a year or two.
> Cough-cough.

when I first saw the spec for IPv6 I mistakenly thought they'd done away 
with ports entirely, and that you'd just use an IP range for a server 
for different services... but that would be a mess for DNS, having to 
use a different hostname for ssh rather than http etc, a physical host 
would likely use a subdomain in that scheme (ssh.myhost.mydomain.com vs 
http.myhost.mydomain.com  etc etc)


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos