On 02/25/11 3:27 AM, ken wrote:
> I read that. I would imagine that a lot of digital cameras-- in fact, a
> lot of digital devices-- employ Linux in their firmware. If I were
> writing code for an ARM processor, that's what I'd do. Why reinvent the
> wheel? You'd think under the GPL they'd be required to divulge the
> firmware code. And there should be a way to hack into these. But now
> I'm going way OT.
the embedded device guys seem to get around that nowdays by offering the
source as a generic kernel and util tarball and a tarball of their own
code they consider GPL, which is almost never buildable without massive
effort, and is usually very incomplete.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
